Skip to content
DataMiner DoJo

More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Search in posts
Search in pages
Log in
Menu
  • Updates & Insights
  • Questions
  • Learning
    • E-learning Courses
    • Empower Replay: Limited Edition
    • Tutorials
    • Open Classroom Training
    • Certification
      • DataMiner Fundamentals
      • DataMiner Configurator
      • DataMiner Automation
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: HTTP Basics
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: SNMP Basics
      • Visual Overview – Level 1
      • Verify a certificate
    • YouTube Videos
    • Solutions & Use Cases
      • Solutions
      • Use Case Library
    • Agility
      • Book your Agile Fundamentals training
      • Book you Kanban workshop
      • Learn more about Agile
        • Agile Webspace
        • Everything Agile
          • The Agile Manifesto
          • Best Practices
          • Retro Recipes
        • Methodologies
          • The Scrum Framework
          • Kanban
          • Extreme Programming
        • Roles
          • The Product Owner
          • The Agile Coach
          • The Quality & UX Coach (QX)
    • >> Go to DataMiner Docs
  • DevOps
    • About the DevOps Program
    • Sign up for the DevOps Pogram
    • DataMiner DevOps Support
    • Feature Suggestions
    • Climb the leaderboard!
    • Swag Shop
  • Downloads
  • Contact
    • Sales, Training & Certification
    • DataMiner Support
    • Global Feedback Survey
  • PARTNERS
    • All Partners
    • Technology Partners
    • Strategic Partner Program
    • Solutions
    • Deal Registration
  • >> Go to dataminer.services

Correlate Alarms by Element Name

Solved1.37K views11th July 2023alarms Correlation rules
0
ryan yahia890 18th November 2021 0 Comments

I have applied this filter on alarms with a specific alarm ID and then correlating these alarms on a per element basis. However looking at the output we see multiple alarms per element which haven’t correlated.

Below is the rule that has been added.

as requested by Michaël I have attached the actions.

Marieke Goethals [SLC] [DevOps Catalyst] Selected answer as best 11th July 2023

2 Answers

  • Active
  • Voted
  • Newest
  • Oldest
0
Wouter Demuynck [SLC] [DevOps Advocate]6.02K Posted 22nd November 2021 0 Comments

Hi Ryan,

Since you’re grouping per element anyway, I’d advise to leave the “correlate across DMAs” checkbox unchecked. (all alarm events that need to be grouped together are originating from the same element/agent)

This correlation rule is supposed to combine all of the simultaneously active *34003* alarms for an element together in one correlated alarm event on that same element. I’m not seeing any obvious configuration errors in the screenshots.

Marieke Goethals [SLC] [DevOps Catalyst] Selected answer as best 11th July 2023
0
Michaël Pincket [SLC] [DevOps Advocate]1.79K Posted 19th November 2021 3 Comments

Hi Ryan,

At first sight I don’t see anything wrong with the correlation rule. Is it possible to add a screenshot of the “Actions” section of your correlation rule as well as a screenshot of the alarms which are not correlated?

ryan yahia Edited comment 19th November 2021
ryan yahia commented 19th November 2021

Hi Michaël,

As requested I have attached a screenshot of the Actions and the alarms in the main questions.

Thanks,
Ryan

Michaël Pincket [SLC] [DevOps Advocate] commented 19th November 2021

Hi Ryan,

Thanks for the additional information.

I think there can be two reasons why the rule is not triggered :

* The alarms do not match the alarmfilter you have entered in the correlation rule. This wouls mean that the alarms don’t contain “34003” in their parameterdescription.

* The DMA you selected to handle the correlation rule is not running.

Could you check if one of the above reasons is the cause for your issue?

ryan yahia commented 19th November 2021

Hi Michaël,

Apologies the example I gave is for Alarms 34008, but the same behaviour exists for alarms with identity with 34003.

With the second point if the dma is not running for a period of time will the rule be automatically applied after it is. I have checked on the machine and the dma is running.

Please login to be able to comment or post an answer.

My DevOps rank

DevOps Members get more insights on their profile page.

My user earnings

0 Dojo credits

Spend your credits in our swag shop.

0 Reputation points

Boost your reputation, climb the leaderboard.

Promo banner DataMiner DevOps Professiona Program
DataMiner Integration Studio (DIS)
Empower Katas
Privacy Policy • Terms & Conditions • Contact

© 2025 Skyline Communications. All rights reserved.

DOJO Q&A widget

Can't find what you need?

? Explore the Q&A DataMiner Docs