Skip to content
DataMiner DoJo

More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Search in posts
Search in pages
Log in
Menu
  • Updates & Insights
  • Questions
  • Learning
    • E-learning Courses
    • Empower Replay: Limited Edition
    • Tutorials
    • Open Classroom Training
    • Certification
      • DataMiner Fundamentals
      • DataMiner Configurator
      • DataMiner Automation
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: HTTP Basics
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: SNMP Basics
      • Visual Overview – Level 1
      • Verify a certificate
    • Video Library
    • Books We Like
    • >> Go to DataMiner Docs
  • Expert Center
    • Solutions & Use Cases
      • Solutions
      • Use Case Library
    • Markets & Industries
      • Media production
      • Government & defense
      • Content distribution
      • Service providers
      • Partners
      • OSS/BSS
    • Agile
      • Agile Webspace
      • Everything Agile
        • The Agile Manifesto
        • Best Practices
        • Retro Recipes
      • Methodologies
        • The Scrum Framework
        • Kanban
        • Extreme Programming
      • Roles
        • The Product Owner
        • The Agile Coach
        • The Quality & UX Coach (QX)
    • DataMiner DevOps Professional Program
      • About the DevOps Program
      • DataMiner DevOps Support
  • Downloads
  • More
    • DataMiner Releases & Updates
    • Feature Suggestions
    • Climb the leaderboard!
    • Swag Shop
    • Contact
    • Global Feedback Survey
  • PARTNERS
    • All Partners
    • Technology Partners
    • Strategic Partner Program
    • Deal Registration
  • >> Go to dataminer.services

Capping the service alarm severity depending on the inclusion/exclusion of a service element.

Solved629 views8th August 2023
7
Pedro de Lima [DevOps Advocate]612 26th July 2023 0 Comments

I have an element in a service that gets dynamically excluded depending on the some other parameters from other elements.

When this element is excluded, I still want alarms to be shown on the service though capped at a much lower level, say at maximum warning. I have configured it as shown on below snapshots, but the service severity is not showing the expected warning colour.

The element in question is excluded but has a critical alarm.

Do I misunderstand this “Maximum severity on element not used” function or am I doing something wrong.

Marieke Goethals [SLC] [DevOps Catalyst] Selected answer as best 8th August 2023

2 Answers

  • Active
  • Voted
  • Newest
  • Oldest
2
Ben Vandenberghe [SLC] [DevOps Enabler]9.06K Posted 26th July 2023 0 Comments

It’s been a while, but I believe it may have to do with the following:

An element (or part thereof) can be included and excluded in a service.  But if it is included, there are still two options, either it is in use or it is not in use.  So overall considered, an element can be:

  • included and in use
  • included but not in use
  • excluded

If you exclude it, then there is simply no way that it can still impact the service, that’s by definition.  You want the element to still somehow have an impact on the service, even if it is not in use by the service.  So I believe you will have to change your configuration, so that:

  1. THIS ELEMENT IS INCLUDED IN THE SERVICE > always  (you want to keep it in there, so that it can still influence the alarm state of the service – you can still use this condition, but only if under specific conditions you want the element out of the service, in which case it cannot impact the severity of that service anymore).
  2. ONCE INCLUDED, THIS ELEMENT WILL… > instead of always as you have it now, put in your previous condition here.  Basically you will say, under the conditions I specific, I consider the element to be effectively used by the service and it can fully impact the service.

Now you can use the option that you referenced.  “Maximum severity on element not used”.  This will be applied when your element is not used, i.e. if the condition in 2. above is not met.  In other words, your element is still in the service, but considered to be not in use.  You were a little mislead there with the option, but it does effectively say “not in use” and not when it is “excluded”.

This is an example of how it should look like:

In this case, LONDON SITE 1 BACKUP is included in the service and considered IN USE.  LONDON SITE 1 MAIN however is not in use.  This is indicated because the color is a bit faded, and it is also mentioned between brackets.  This is the result of saying that this element is always included in the service, but only in use when the condition is met (currently the condition is not met, so it is considered not in use).

And the option to cap the impact is used.  That is indicated by the blue arrow.  Basically you can see that the Audio has a critical alarm, but with that option it was capped at warning level.  So the blue arrow shows that the critical alarm on the audio is bubbling upwards to the service level as a warning alarm (because of the fact that the element is not in active use by the service).  If the element would suddenly become in use (condition is met), then that device would appear in bright white font, the ‘not in case’ between brackets would disappear, and the impact on the service would go from warning to critical.

I believe this is what you were looking for?

If you go to the ziine.skyline.be system, you should be able to log in with your Dojo account, and you look for the OLYMPICS-OFFAIR service, you will find the above example for reference (not sure though if you will be able to go into edit mode to see the configuration of the service).

Feel free to circle back if this wasn’t what you were looking for.

Marieke Goethals [SLC] [DevOps Catalyst] Selected answer as best 8th August 2023
1
Sebastian Ulloa [SLC] [DevOps Advocate]1.90K Posted 26th July 2023 0 Comments

Hi Pedro,

You might then want to move the conditions to the section “Once included, this element will influence the overall alarm severity of the service”. The term “element not used”, means that the element is included in the service, but it does not influence the alarm severity of the service. See explanation in DataMiner docs: Service card pages | DataMiner Docs

If the conditions are not met, then the element won’t influence the service alarm severity and it will show a Warning state, based on your configuration.

Sebastian Ulloa [SLC] [DevOps Advocate] Answered question 26th July 2023
Please login to be able to comment or post an answer.

My DevOps rank

DevOps Members get more insights on their profile page.

My user earnings

0 Dojo credits

Spend your credits in our swag shop.

0 Reputation points

Boost your reputation, climb the leaderboard.

Promo banner DataMiner DevOps Professiona Program
DataMiner Integration Studio (DIS)
Empower Katas
Privacy Policy • Terms & Conditions • Contact

© 2025 Skyline Communications. All rights reserved.

DOJO Q&A widget

Can't find what you need?

? Explore the Q&A DataMiner Docs