Skip to content
DataMiner DoJo

More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Search in posts
Search in pages
Log in
Menu
  • Updates & Insights
  • Questions
  • Learning
    • E-learning Courses
    • Empower Replay: Limited Edition
    • Tutorials
    • Video Library
    • Open Classroom Training
    • Certification
      • DataMiner Fundamentals
      • DataMiner Configurator
      • DataMiner Automation
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: HTTP Basics
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: SNMP Basics
      • Visual Overview – Level 1
      • Verify a certificate
    • Solutions & Use Cases
      • Solutions
      • Use Case Library
    • Agility
      • Book your Agile Fundamentals training
      • Book you Kanban workshop
      • Learn more about Agile
        • Agile Webspace
        • Everything Agile
          • The Agile Manifesto
          • Best Practices
          • Retro Recipes
        • Methodologies
          • The Scrum Framework
          • Kanban
          • Extreme Programming
        • Roles
          • The Product Owner
          • The Agile Coach
          • The Quality & UX Coach (QX)
    • Books We Like
    • >> Go to DataMiner Docs
  • DataMiner DevOps Professional Program
    • About the DevOps Program
    • Sign up for the DevOps Pogram
  • Downloads
  • Contact
    • Get in touch
    • DataMiner Support
    • DataMiner DevOps Support
  • More
    • Feature Suggestions
    • Climb the leaderboard!
    • Swag Shop
    • Global Feedback Survey
  • PARTNERS
    • All Partners
    • Technology Partners
    • Strategic Partner Program
    • Solutions
    • Deal Registration
  • >> Go to dataminer.services

Number of QActions vs size of QActions

Solved1.47K views17th November 2020protocol QAction
4
Jens Vandewalle [SLC] [DevOps Enabler]9.50K 2nd October 2020 0 Comments

Now that we have the protocol-as-solution functionality it's possible to put all the scripting code in just a few QActions and still maintain a readable and structured overview by making use of folders  and separate cs files.

Is there negative impact when using just a few big QActions instead of many small QActions?

Jens Vandewalle [SLC] [DevOps Enabler] Selected answer as best 17th November 2020

2 Answers

  • Active
  • Voted
  • Newest
  • Oldest
2
João Severino [SLC] [DevOps Catalyst]13.28K Posted 2nd October 2020 0 Comments

With the protocol as solution, it can still make sense to have multiple QActions to organize your features and group your triggers.

This way you can at a glance know which parameters are linked to which specific features and what they do from the protocol XML.

João Severino [SLC] [DevOps Catalyst] Answered question 2nd October 2020
You are viewing 1 out of 2 answers, click here to view all answers.
Please login to be able to comment or post an answer.

My DevOps rank

DevOps Members get more insights on their profile page.

My user earnings

0 Dojo credits

Spend your credits in our swag shop.

0 Reputation points

Boost your reputation, climb the leaderboard.

Promo banner DataMiner DevOps Professiona Program
DataMiner Integration Studio (DIS)
Empower Katas
Privacy Policy • Terms & Conditions • Contact

© 2025 Skyline Communications. All rights reserved.

DOJO Q&A widget

Can't find what you need?

? Explore the Q&A DataMiner Docs

[ Placeholder content for popup link ] WordPress Download Manager - Best Download Management Plugin