Skip to content
DataMiner Dojo

More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Search in posts
Search in pages
Log in
Menu
  • Updates & Insights
  • Questions
  • Learning
    • E-learning Courses
    • Empower Replay: Limited Edition
    • Tutorials
    • Open Classroom Training
    • Certification
      • DataMiner Fundamentals
      • DataMiner Configurator
      • DataMiner Automation
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: HTTP Basics
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: SNMP Basics
      • Visual Overview – Level 1
      • Verify a certificate
    • YouTube Videos
    • Solutions & Use Cases
      • Solutions
      • Use Case Library
    • Agility
      • Book your Agile Fundamentals training
      • Book you Kanban workshop
      • Learn more about Agile
        • Agile Webspace
        • Everything Agile
          • The Agile Manifesto
          • Best Practices
          • Retro Recipes
        • Methodologies
          • The Scrum Framework
          • Kanban
          • Extreme Programming
        • Roles
          • The Product Owner
          • The Agile Coach
          • The Quality & UX Coach (QX)
    • >> Go to DataMiner Docs
  • DevOps
    • About the DevOps Program
    • Sign up for the DevOps Pogram
    • DataMiner DevOps Support
    • Feature Suggestions
  • Downloads
  • Swag Shop
  • PARTNERS
    • Business Partners
    • Technology Partners
  • Contact
    • Sales, Training & Certification
    • DataMiner Support
    • Global Feedback Survey
  • >> Go to dataminer.services

Correlation Rule for Single Source Outage

Solved111 views4 days agoCorrelation rule
1
Joe Hipp [DevOps Advocate]296 29th July 2025 3 Comments

We currently use a correlation rule to generate fast alerts when dual source outages occur for a given service, which works well.

Separately, we have a more relaxed threshold in place that triggers a single source outage alert when only one source fails. However, this can lead to noisy or redundant alerts, especially in scenarios where the dual source outage has already been detected.

I’m looking to create a new correlation rule or modify the existing logic so that:

  • If a dual source outage alert has already been raised for a specific service,
  • Then any subsequent single source outage alert (for that same service and timeframe) — for either source — is suppressed or blocked.

This would help streamline incident visibility and reduce alert fatigue.

Has anyone implemented logic like this in DataMiner using correlation rules before? I’m open to suggestions or example configurations if available.

Added screenshot mentioned in comments below showing missing services entry for the Source(s) for service are down alarm. Same table as the other alarms.

Joe Hipp [DevOps Advocate] Selected answer as best 4 days ago
Sebastian Ulloa [SLC] [DevOps Advocate] commented 30th July 2025

Hi Joe,

Would a condition in the alarm template help? See: https://docs.dataminer.services/dataminer/Operator_guide/Protocols_and_templates/Alarm_templates/Configuring_alarm_templates/Using_conditions_in_an_alarm_template.html

I'm thinking the single source outage alarm can be configured so it gets alarmed only if the dual source has a specific value (i.e. a value that does not represent an alarm)

Joe Hipp [DevOps Advocate] commented 1st August 2025

Hi Sabastian,
I hadn't thought about handling this as a condition. Let me test this out next week and I'll post the configuration. I'll let you know. Thanks.

Joe Hipp [DevOps Advocate] commented 5 days ago

I tried using an alarm-template condition to block single-source alerts when a dual-source outage is active. In my setup, that approach didn’t work. While testing my correlation rules, I noticed another problem: I group alerts by Service, but the “Source(s) for server are down” alarms don’t show any Service link, so they don’t get grouped as expected. See attached screenshot.

Environment

Driver version: 1.2.1.8

Planning to test: 1.3.0.1 to see if the behavior is the same

1 Answer

  • Active
  • Voted
  • Newest
  • Oldest
0
Marieke Goethals [SLC] [DevOps Catalyst]6.03K Posted 6 days ago 1 Comment

Hi Joe,
I see that this question has been inactive for some time now. Have you been able to resolve this based on Sebastian's suggestion? If yes, could you post an answer of your own for reference for other users, or else select this answer so this question is closed and it's clear no further follow-up is needed?

Joe Hipp [DevOps Advocate] Selected answer as best 4 days ago
Joe Hipp [DevOps Advocate] commented 5 days ago

Sorry I've been tied up on some other issues. I'll focus some time on this today and will post my results.

Please login to be able to comment or post an answer.

My DevOps rank

DevOps Members get more insights on their profile page.

My user earnings

0 Dojo credits

Spend your credits in our swag shop.

0 Reputation points

Boost your reputation, climb the leaderboard.

Promo banner DataMiner DevOps Professiona Program
DataMiner Integration Studio (DIS)
Empower Katas
Privacy Policy • Terms & Conditions • Contact

© 2025 Skyline Communications. All rights reserved.

DOJO Q&A widget

Can't find what you need?

? Explore the Q&A DataMiner Docs

[ Placeholder content for popup link ] WordPress Download Manager - Best Download Management Plugin