Hey Dojo!
Have a query regarding the level at which my IT admin would expect to accept the Teams Chat is in the organisation level, not with a particular environment.
Would that mean that it is linked into Prod/Dev/Stage at the top level?
Even if the other environments don't have the setup for the bot yet.
Their point being that it 'could' affect prod, potentially.
This is what made my IT team ask the query above..
https://docs.dataminer.services/user-guide/Cloud_Platform/CloudAdminApp/Granting_admin_consent.html
8. In the pop-up window, log in to our multi-tenant app with your Microsoft account. Make sure to log in with the same user as you granted consent with.
After you log in successfully, your tenant is configured.
Hi Wil,
Yes, indeed. The idea is indeed to make the link between the Azure tenant and DataMiner on the organization level in dataminer.services. When making that link, you basically allow the DataMiner app in your tenant. Here you indeed need to involve your IT to allow the usage of this DataMiner Teams app.
Once the app is allowed, it's up to the administrator of the DataMiner systems to define the security rights in DataMiner on who can access which system and what they can do. The Teams app is just another 'UI' on the DataMiner system, whether you get the alarms via the Teams app or via Cube, your user will always get the exact same alarms back depending on the security rights you have.
In other words, granting an admin consent, is more about trusting the DataMiner app in your tenant yes or no, and not so much about security of DataMiner. But we could and maybe should indeed allow you to enable/disable the Teams app on a DMS level, but then I would propose to do this with checkbox the owner configure, and leave one admin consent on organization level. Then you only need IT once to allow the app, and the owner can choose to allow the app in prod/dev/staging.
And about point 8 in that help, it's a bit phrased in a strange way, I'll review that with technical writing.
I hope this clarifies the situation a bit, feel free to further comment on this.
Bert.
Thanks Bert!
No further questions from me.