Skip to content
DataMiner DoJo

More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Search in posts
Search in pages
Log in
Menu
  • Blog
  • Questions
  • Learning
    • E-learning Courses
    • Open Classroom Training
    • Certification
      • DataMiner Fundamentals
      • DataMiner Configurator
      • DataMiner Automation
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: HTTP Basics
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: SNMP Basics
      • Visual Overview – Level 1
      • Verify a certificate
    • Tutorials
    • Video Library
    • Books We Like
    • >> Go to DataMiner Docs
  • Expert Center
    • Solutions & Use Cases
      • Solutions
      • Use Case Library
    • Markets & Industries
      • Media production
      • Government & defense
      • Content distribution
      • Service providers
      • Partners
      • OSS/BSS
    • DataMiner Insights
      • Security
      • Integration Studio
      • System Architecture
      • DataMiner Releases & Updates
      • DataMiner Apps
    • Agile
      • Agile Webspace
      • Everything Agile
        • The Agile Manifesto
        • Best Practices
        • Retro Recipes
      • Methodologies
        • The Scrum Framework
        • Kanban
        • Extreme Programming
      • Roles
        • The Product Owner
        • The Agile Coach
        • The Quality & UX Coach (QX)
    • DataMiner DevOps Professional Program
  • Downloads
  • More
    • Feature Suggestions
    • Climb the leaderboard!
    • Swag Shop
    • Contact
      • General Inquiries
      • DataMiner DevOps Support
      • Commercial Requests
    • Global Feedback Survey
  • PARTNERS
    • All Partners
    • Technology Partners
    • Strategic Partner Program
    • Deal Registration
  • >> Go to dataminer.services

Tree Control: relation ingore second or third table

Solved605 views5th March 2024
1
Francisco Javier Pascual [DevOps Advocate]52 26th February 2024 0 Comments

Hi everyone!

working on the Tree Controls, we have observed, that the Tree Control ignore the second or the third table. When we change the order, the first table is just the only one that are shown on the tree control structure. The extra thing is, in the Extra Tabs, the alarms are shown correct.

We have three diferents typs of Frame Synchronizer Cards, not always are the three typs in a Frame but sometimes they are. At the image below, there are two of three.

These cards are correctly shown at the Tree Control and recognized at the Extra Tabs.

But when we select one typ in the Tree Control structure, it show no details.

Under Table 12900, (Frame Synchro Links Complete) are the three differents Frame Synchro Cards: 200, 230 & 260. The order they are listed is very important, because just the first one typ, in this case the 260, is the only one listed in detail in the Tree Control.

The order of the relations here is irrelevant. I have already check the M:N Relations Examples and I am not able to find out, where is the probleme. Any tips are welcome.

Thanks

Marieke Goethals [SLC] [DevOps Catalyst] Selected answer as best 5th March 2024

1 Answer

  • Active
  • Voted
  • Newest
  • Oldest
0
Tom Waterbley [SLC] [DevOps Catalyst]8.86K Posted 27th February 2024 3 Comments

Hi Francisco,

An advanced hierarchy with multiple child tables for the same parent table, requires a condition that specifies from which table the children should be taken.

Is there a column in table 12900 that indicates which indicates the type of the frame synchronizer card? Then you could do something like this inside the Hierarchy tag:

<Table id="12900" />
<Table id="260" parent="12900" condition="12902:pvd5822d" />
<Table id="230" parent="12900" condition="12902:pvd5840uo" />
<Table id="200" parent="12900" condition="12902:pvd5840d" />

See the following page for more information: https://docs.dataminer.services/develop/devguide/Connector/UIComponentsTreeControlAdvancedHierarchy.html

Marieke Goethals [SLC] [DevOps Catalyst] Selected answer as best 5th March 2024
Francisco Javier Pascual [DevOps Advocate] commented 27th February 2024

Hi Tom,

It make sense. I will try it. thanks for the tip.

Francisco Javier Pascual [DevOps Advocate] commented 27th February 2024

Hi Tom,

issue resolved! It´s works. Thank you very much.

Tom Waterbley [SLC] [DevOps Catalyst] commented 27th February 2024

You’re welcome! I’m glad I was able to help.

Please login to be able to comment or post an answer.

My DevOps rank

DevOps Members get more insights on their profile page.

My user earnings

0 Dojo credits

Spend your credits in our swag shop.

0 Reputation points

Boost your reputation, climb the leaderboard.

Promo banner DataMiner DevOps Professiona Program
DataMiner Integration Studio (DIS)
Empower Katas

Recent questions

Web Applications exception in Cube due to invalid certificate 0 Answers | 0 Votes
Redundancy Groups and Alarming – Duplicate Alarms 0 Answers | 0 Votes
Correlation Engine: “Test rule” doesn’t result in a hit, despite functional rule 1 Answer | 3 Votes

Question Tags

adl2099 (115) alarm (62) Alarm Console (82) alarms (100) alarm template (83) Automation (223) automation scipt (111) Automation script (167) backup (71) Cassandra (180) Connector (109) Correlation (69) Correlation rule (52) Cube (151) Dashboard (194) Dashboards (188) database (83) DataMiner Cube (57) DIS (81) DMS (71) DOM (140) driver (65) DVE (56) Elastic (83) Elasticsearch (115) elements (80) Failover (104) GQI (159) HTTP (76) IDP (74) LCA (152) low code app (166) low code apps (93) lowcodeapps (75) MySQL (53) protocol (203) QAction (83) security (88) SNMP (86) SRM (337) table (54) trending (87) upgrade (62) Visio (539) Visual Overview (345)
Privacy Policy • Terms & Conditions • Contact

© 2025 Skyline Communications. All rights reserved.

DOJO Q&A widget

Can't find what you need?

? Explore the Q&A DataMiner Docs

[ Placeholder content for popup link ] WordPress Download Manager - Best Download Management Plugin