Skip to content
DataMiner DoJo

More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Search in posts
Search in pages
Log in
Menu
  • Updates & Insights
  • Questions
  • Learning
    • E-learning Courses
    • Empower Replay: Limited Edition
    • Tutorials
    • Open Classroom Training
    • Certification
      • DataMiner Fundamentals
      • DataMiner Configurator
      • DataMiner Automation
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: HTTP Basics
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: SNMP Basics
      • Visual Overview – Level 1
      • Verify a certificate
    • Video Library
    • Books We Like
    • >> Go to DataMiner Docs
  • Expert Center
    • Solutions & Use Cases
      • Solutions
      • Use Case Library
    • Markets & Industries
      • Media production
      • Government & defense
      • Content distribution
      • Service providers
      • Partners
      • OSS/BSS
    • Agile
      • Agile Webspace
      • Everything Agile
        • The Agile Manifesto
        • Best Practices
        • Retro Recipes
      • Methodologies
        • The Scrum Framework
        • Kanban
        • Extreme Programming
      • Roles
        • The Product Owner
        • The Agile Coach
        • The Quality & UX Coach (QX)
    • DataMiner DevOps Professional Program
      • About the DevOps Program
      • DataMiner DevOps Support
  • Downloads
  • More
    • DataMiner Releases & Updates
    • Feature Suggestions
    • Climb the leaderboard!
    • Swag Shop
    • Contact
    • Global Feedback Survey
  • PARTNERS
    • All Partners
    • Technology Partners
    • Strategic Partner Program
    • Deal Registration
  • >> Go to dataminer.services

Processing SNMPv3 traps from Arris CMTS

Solved821 views20th February 2024SNMP traps SNMPv3
3
Arunkrishna Shreeder [SLC] [DevOps Advocate]4.03K 14th February 2024 0 Comments

Hi all,

We have 2 DMAs, one running 9.6 and one running 10.3. We configured same number of SNMPv3 traps to be received on either DMA and we noticed 10.3 is missing some traps while 9.6 is receiving them – verified via Wireshark.

Once the 10.3 DMA is restarted, traps are being processed for 30 minutes after which they fail.

  • It is confirmed that Windows firewall has an inbound rule for local UDP port 162 for Domain, Private and Public
  • CMTS devices use credentials from Credential Library that uses noAuthNoPriv.

After further checking, we noticed that the traps sent by the CMTS devices were missing the msgUserName (see screenshot below).

An update was made on the CMTS devices to populate the correct msgUserName. After this update was done, the traps were observed to be processed without a DMA restart.
Could you explain why this is the case ? Is there something we could check here ?

Arunkrishna Shreeder [SLC] [DevOps Advocate] Selected answer as best 20th February 2024

1 Answer

  • Active
  • Voted
  • Newest
  • Oldest
2
Jeroen Neyt [SLC] [DevOps Advocate]2.35K Posted 19th February 2024 0 Comments

The User-based Security Model for SNMPv3 (RFC3414) requires the presence of a valid username in the msgUserName field for proper authentication and authorization. An empty or missing msgUserName will result in a security-related error, as the security model relies on the identification of the user who generated the SNMP message.

The library that DataMiner is using to capture these incoming traps (snmp++) is discarding them for above described reason. If you rectified it on the CMTS devices for the traps to include a valid username, it is expected that they should start coming through. That should be sufficient and a DataMiner restart is not required.

With DataMiner 10, the snmp++ library got a significant upgrade to version 3.3.11. I did not find any release note which can clearly confirm this, but that might be a reason why those traps were still coming through in DataMiner 9.6. With that security issue now being patched, the behavior in DataMiner 10 and newer is correct and what is expected.

Having this clearly logged in the SLSNMPManager logging should be a good improvement to quickly understand why some traps are not being processed. I will create an internal ticket to look into this.

Arunkrishna Shreeder [SLC] [DevOps Advocate] Selected answer as best 20th February 2024
Please login to be able to comment or post an answer.

My DevOps rank

DevOps Members get more insights on their profile page.

My user earnings

0 Dojo credits

Spend your credits in our swag shop.

0 Reputation points

Boost your reputation, climb the leaderboard.

Promo banner DataMiner DevOps Professiona Program
DataMiner Integration Studio (DIS)
Empower Katas
Privacy Policy • Terms & Conditions • Contact

© 2025 Skyline Communications. All rights reserved.

DOJO Q&A widget

Can't find what you need?

? Explore the Q&A DataMiner Docs