Skip to content
DataMiner Dojo

More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Search in posts
Search in pages
Log in
Menu
  • Updates & Insights
  • Questions
  • Learning
    • E-learning Courses
    • Tutorials
    • Open Classroom Training
    • Certification
      • DataMiner Fundamentals
      • DataMiner Configurator
      • DataMiner Automation
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: HTTP Basics
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: SNMP Basics
      • Visual Overview – Level 1
      • Verify a certificate
    • YouTube Videos
    • Solutions & Use Cases
      • Solutions
      • Use Case Library
    • Agility
      • Learn more about Agile
        • Agile Webspace
        • Everything Agile
          • The Agile Manifesto
          • Best Practices
          • Retro Recipes
        • Methodologies
          • The Scrum Framework
          • Kanban
          • Extreme Programming
        • Roles
          • The Product Owner
          • The Agile Coach
          • The Quality & UX Coach (QX)
      • Book your Agile Fundamentals training
      • Book you Kanban workshop
    • >> Go to DataMiner Docs
  • DevOps
    • About the DevOps Program
    • Sign up for the DevOps Program
    • DataMiner DevOps Support
    • Feature Suggestions
  • Downloads
  • Swag Shop
  • PARTNERS
    • Business Partners
    • Technology Partners
  • Contact
    • Sales, Training & Certification
    • DataMiner Support
    • Global Feedback Survey
  • >> Go to dataminer.services

Edge-Core Networks Data Center Switch driver polling

47 views4 days agoedgecore SNMP snmpv1 snmpv2 Switch
3
Esteban Pardo [SLC] [DevOps Advocate]466 4 days ago 0 Comments

We’ve been analyzing an SNMP walk from one Edge-Core switches and noticed it returns non-consecutive interface indexes (like 1, 2, 54, 746, 1001, 1404, etc.).

Our driver polls the ifTable using this configuration:

OID

type="complete"

options=";instance;multipleGetNext"


I understand that this method assumes consecutive indexes and uses incremental GetNext requests instead of performing a full SNMP walk.
It works well with most models but can miss higher or non-sequential indexes — for example, VLAN or loopback interfaces.

I’d like to understand the design reasoning behind this choice, since it is not returning any information in one of our customers.

Any insights from those who’ve worked on similar drivers or protocols would be great.

Esteban Pardo [SLC] [DevOps Advocate] Edited question 4 days ago

0 Answers

  • Active
  • Voted
  • Newest
  • Oldest
Please login to be able to comment or post an answer.

My DevOps rank

DevOps Members get more insights on their profile page.

My user earnings

0 Dojo credits

Spend your credits in our swag shop.

0 Reputation points

Boost your reputation, climb the leaderboard.

Promo banner DataMiner DevOps Professiona Program
DataMiner Integration Studio (DIS)
Empower Katas
Privacy Policy • Terms & Conditions • Contact

© 2025 Skyline Communications. All rights reserved.

DOJO Q&A widget

Can't find what you need?

? Explore the Q&A DataMiner Docs

[ Placeholder content for popup link ] WordPress Download Manager - Best Download Management Plugin