Skip to content
DataMiner DoJo

More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Search in posts
Search in pages
Log in
Menu
  • Updates & Insights
  • Questions
  • Learning
    • E-learning Courses
    • Empower Replay: Limited Edition
    • Tutorials
    • Open Classroom Training
    • Certification
      • DataMiner Fundamentals
      • DataMiner Configurator
      • DataMiner Automation
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: HTTP Basics
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: SNMP Basics
      • Visual Overview – Level 1
      • Verify a certificate
    • Video Library
    • Books We Like
    • >> Go to DataMiner Docs
  • Expert Center
    • Solutions & Use Cases
      • Solutions
      • Use Case Library
    • Markets & Industries
      • Media production
      • Government & defense
      • Content distribution
      • Service providers
      • Partners
      • OSS/BSS
    • Agile
      • Agile Webspace
      • Everything Agile
        • The Agile Manifesto
        • Best Practices
        • Retro Recipes
      • Methodologies
        • The Scrum Framework
        • Kanban
        • Extreme Programming
      • Roles
        • The Product Owner
        • The Agile Coach
        • The Quality & UX Coach (QX)
    • DataMiner DevOps Professional Program
      • About the DevOps Program
      • DataMiner DevOps Support
  • Downloads
  • More
    • DataMiner Releases & Updates
    • Feature Suggestions
    • Climb the leaderboard!
    • Swag Shop
    • Contact
    • Global Feedback Survey
  • PARTNERS
    • All Partners
    • Technology Partners
    • Strategic Partner Program
    • Deal Registration
  • >> Go to dataminer.services

Skyline SLA – Violation configuration

Solved2.19K views8th July 2022SLA Violation Configuration
1
Bing Herng Chong [SLC] [DevOps Advocate]1.06K 4th July 2022 0 Comments

Hi, a user has the following use case for SLA:

A single SLA (SLA_TEST_TNT-1) to keep track of availability of a single service (TNT1)

  • A critical alarm raised by TEST-Newtech-HE will impact the SLA by 100%
  • A critical alarm raised by TEST-PVR-01-Mux1 will impact the SLA by 50%
  • A critical alarm raised by TEST-PVR-02-Mux1 will impact the SLA by 37%
  • A critical alarm raised by TEST-PVR-03-Mux1 will impact the SLA by 13%

We have attempted to configure and test out a few Violation configurations but each time, the elements in the child services (TNT101 Site-X) will contribute 100% impact to SLA.

For example, the expected outcome of the following config should be that TEST-PVR-01-Mux1 will impact the SLA by 50% but we observe that the impact is still 100%.

Any guidance to configure an SLA to meet the above use case would be much appreciated.

Updated question with additional info: The following are options for Violation Filter Type:

Bing Herng Chong [SLC] [DevOps Advocate] Selected answer as best 8th July 2022

2 Answers

  • Active
  • Voted
  • Newest
  • Oldest
0
Nicolas Vercaigne [SLC] [DevOps Member]134 Posted 6th July 2022 4 Comments

Hi Bing,

Can it be that you use an alias for the included elements in your service?

You can verify the actual element name that the SLA receives (and filters on) in the "Current Active Service Alarm Element" column on the "Active Service Alarms" page.

What you see in the surveyor is the Alias of the element. But the SLA receives "raw" alarms from the element, that does not know of any Alias for services.

Nicolas Vercaigne [SLC] [DevOps Member] Posted new comment 8th July 2022
Bing Herng Chong [SLC] [DevOps Advocate] commented 6th July 2022

Hi Nicolas, so I raised an alarm from each of the elements (TEST-Newtech-HE in the ‘root’ service as well as TEST-PVR-01-Mux1 in the ‘child’ service). For both cases, I see an entry in the Outage List with ‘End Timestamp’ = ‘now’ indicating that an outage is occurring and impacting the SLA. However, for both cases I observed that the contents of the ‘Current Active Service Alarms’ table is empty. This does not seem right does it?

Nicolas Vercaigne [SLC] [DevOps Member] commented 6th July 2022

On the “Advanced Configuration” page you can find the “Active Alarms” parameter. If this is set to “Hide” you will not see the current active alarms as described above.
You can toggle this to “Show” to see the current active alarms. (Note that you may need to increase your security level to do this)

I hope this solves your issue.

Bing Herng Chong [SLC] [DevOps Advocate] commented 7th July 2022

Hi Nicolas, thanks for that advice. The alarms I raised are now listed in the ‘Current Active Service Alarms’ table.

I can also see that the ‘Current Active Service Alarm Element’ is populated with the actual Element Name. And this is expected as we are not using Aliases.

Nicolas Vercaigne [SLC] [DevOps Member] commented 8th July 2022

Then this could indeed be an issue, as on my internal test setup this seems to be working fine for me.

Could you also list the SLA version and DMA version?

You are viewing 1 out of 2 answers, click here to view all answers.
Please login to be able to comment or post an answer.

My DevOps rank

DevOps Members get more insights on their profile page.

My user earnings

0 Dojo credits

Spend your credits in our swag shop.

0 Reputation points

Boost your reputation, climb the leaderboard.

Promo banner DataMiner DevOps Professiona Program
DataMiner Integration Studio (DIS)
Empower Katas
Privacy Policy • Terms & Conditions • Contact

© 2025 Skyline Communications. All rights reserved.

DOJO Q&A widget

Can't find what you need?

? Explore the Q&A DataMiner Docs

[ Placeholder content for popup link ] WordPress Download Manager - Best Download Management Plugin