Skip to content
DataMiner Dojo

More results...

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Search in posts
Search in pages
Log in
Menu
  • Updates & Insights
  • Questions
  • Learning
    • E-learning Courses
    • Tutorials
    • Open Classroom Training
    • Certification
      • DataMiner Fundamentals
      • DataMiner Configurator
      • DataMiner Automation
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: HTTP Basics
      • Scripts & Connectors Developer: SNMP Basics
      • Visual Overview – Level 1
      • Verify a certificate
    • YouTube Videos
    • Solutions & Use Cases
      • Solutions
      • Use Case Library
    • Agility
      • Learn more about Agile
        • Agile Webspace
        • Everything Agile
          • The Agile Manifesto
          • Best Practices
          • Retro Recipes
        • Methodologies
          • The Scrum Framework
          • Kanban
          • Extreme Programming
        • Roles
          • The Product Owner
          • The Agile Coach
          • The Quality & UX Coach (QX)
      • Book your Agile Fundamentals training
      • Book you Kanban workshop
    • >> Go to DataMiner Docs
  • DevOps
    • About the DevOps Program
    • Sign up for the DevOps Program
    • DataMiner DevOps Support
    • Feature Suggestions
  • Downloads
  • Swag Shop
  • PARTNERS
    • Business Partners
    • Technology Partners
  • Contact
    • Sales, Training & Certification
    • DataMiner Support
    • Global Feedback Survey
  • >> Go to dataminer.services

Display Key Fallback Behavior

148 views13th March 2026Dataminer core Display key NamingFormat
3
Sofian Kerkhof [SLC] [DevOps Enabler]219 13th March 2026 0 Comments

Hi Dojo,

While configuring a display key, I noticed some unexpected behavior. When a NamingFormat tag is defined but the referenced parameter does not exist in the table, for example <NamingFormat>,1</NamingFormat> and parameter 1 is a standalone parameter. DataMiner appears to fall back to using the primary key as the display key. In this fallback scenario, the primary key value is automatically converted to lowercase before being written to the display key column. The same behavior occurs when an invalid display key is defined via the naming options.

Additional testing shows that when no display key configuration is provided at all, the column marked as type="displaykey" is populated with a direct copy of the primary key. In this case, however, no lowercase transformation is applied.

Could you confirm whether this is the intended behavior?

  • Is the fallback to the primary key an expected mechanism when the NamingFormat cannot be resolved?
  • And is the difference in casing (lowercase vs. original casing) between these scenarios considered normal?

Thanks in advance.

Sofian Kerkhof [SLC] [DevOps Enabler] Edited question 13th March 2026

0 Answers

  • Active
  • Voted
  • Newest
  • Oldest
Please login to be able to comment or post an answer.

My DevOps rank

DevOps Members get more insights on their profile page.

My user earnings

0 Dojo credits

Spend your credits in our swag shop.

0 Reputation points

Boost your reputation, climb the leaderboard.

Promo banner DataMiner DevOps Professiona Program
DataMiner Integration Studio (DIS)
Empower Katas
Privacy Policy • Terms & Conditions • Contact

© 2026 Skyline Communications. All rights reserved.

DOJO Q&A widget

Can't find what you need?

? Explore the Q&A DataMiner Docs

[ Placeholder content for popup link ] WordPress Download Manager - Best Download Management Plugin